DDMA Headline Animator

Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts

Saturday, December 8, 2012

NATO backs Patriot anti-missile system for Turkey

December 04, 2012

BRUSSELS (AP) — NATO announced Tuesday that it will deploy Patriot anti-missile systems near Turkey's southern border, shoring up defenses against the threat of cross-border attacks from Syria and bringing the United States and its allies closer to Syria's civil war.

The alliance's 28 members decided to limit use of Patriots solely for the defensive purpose of warding off the mortar rounds and shells from Syria that have already killed five Turks. But the announcement also appeared to be a message to Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime at a time when Washington and other governments fear Syria may be readying its chemical weapons stockpiles for possible use.

"We stand with Turkey in the spirit of strong solidarity," NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters. "To anyone who would want to attack Turkey, we say, 'Don't even think about it!'"

Fogh Rasmussen stressed that the deployment of the Patriot systems — which includes missiles, radar and other elements — wouldn't be a first step toward a no-fly zone over parts of Syria or any offensive operation against the Arab state.

But the decision to deploy the systems takes the U.S. and its European partners closer to the war, with the possibility of U.S.-made and NATO-operated hardware being used against the Assad regime for the first time.

Officials say the Patriots will be programmed so that they can intercept only Syrian weapons that cross into Turkish airspace. They aren't allowed to penetrate Syrian territory pre-emptively. That means they would have no immediate effect on any Syrian government offensives — chemical or conventional — that remain strictly inside the country's national borders.

Still, Fogh Rasmussen insisted that the weapons could help de-escalate tensions along a border across which tens of thousands of Syrian refugees have fled and which has emerged as a critical transit point for weapons being smuggled to the rebels fighting to overthrow Assad.

Germany and the Netherlands are expected to give Turkey several batteries of the latest PAC-3 version of the U.S.-built Patriots air defense systems, which intercepts incoming missiles. The U.S. would likely fill any gaps, possibly by sending some from its stocks in Europe.

But the exact details of the deployment and the number of batteries are still to be determined by NATO. A joint team is studying possible basing sites in Turkey, and parliaments in both Germany and the Netherlands must then approve shifting the assets and the possible involvement of several hundred soldiers.

It's unclear if any American soldiers would need to be deployed. Due to the complexity and size of the Patriot batteries — including their radars, command-and-control centers, communications and support facilities — they cannot be flown quickly by air to Turkey and will probably have to travel by sea, alliance officials said. They probably won't arrive in Turkey for another month, officials predicted.

NATO, like the U.S., doesn't want to be drawn into the Syrian conflict. Washington has refused to entertain proposals for no-fly zones over Syria or for providing military support to Syrian rebels, fearful of making the conflict even more violent after 21 months in which more than 40,000 people have died.

The U.S. also cites the risk of extremists among the rebels getting their hands on weapons that they may later use against U.S. allies such as Israel. NATO previously installed long-range Patriot batteries on Turkish territory during the 1991 and the 2003 Iraq wars. They were never used and were withdrawn a few months later.

The Patriot, which first entered service three decades ago, has been successively upgraded over the years. Although mostly used for anti-aircraft defense, advanced versions can also be used against cruise missiles and against medium- and short-range ballistic missiles. They have a maximum range of about 160 kilometers (100 miles) and can reach altitudes of about 80,000 feet.

Syria is reported to have an array of artillery rockets, as well as short- and medium-range missiles. These include Soviet-built SS-21 Scarabs and Scud-B missiles. The Scuds are capable of carrying chemical warheads.

At NATO headquarters in Brussels, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and the alliance's 27 other foreign ministers "unanimously expressed grave concerns about reports that the Syrian regime may be considering the use of chemical weapons," according to Fogh Rasmussen.

"Any such action would be completely unacceptable and a clear breach of international law," he said. His comments came a day after President Barack Obama warned of consequences if Assad made the "tragic mistake" of deploying chemical weapons. American officials say the U.S. and its allies are weighing military options in light of intelligence reports showing the Syrian regime may be readying its unconventional weapons and may be desperate enough to use them.

German ambassador Martin Erdmann said the Bundestag will probably take up the matter next week. The decision was announced after the NATO foreign ministers met Tuesday with their Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov. The Kremlin has stymied more than a year of international efforts to apply global pressure on the Assad regime, its strongest ally in the Arab world, but officials say it has expressed equal concern about the threat of any chemical weapons.

Speaking to reporters, Lavrov said Russia wouldn't object to the Patriots. "We are not trying to interfere with Turkey's right" to defend itself, he said. "We are just saying the threat should not be overstated."

Lavrov stressed that Syrian artillery strikes into Turkey were accidental. And he warned that the conflict "is being increasingly militarized," and that more weaponry in the area would only add to that problem.

Addressing Lavrov and the other 27 NATO foreign ministers, Clinton said Washington and Moscow still have major differences on the political transition needed in Syria. She and her NATO partners issued a statement later, also stressing that the Patriots "will in no way support a no-fly zone or any offensive operation."

Turkey, one of the harshest critics of the Assad regime, asked for the Patriots to defend against possible retaliatory attacks by Syrian missiles. It welcomed the NATO decision, adding in a government statement that it would press on with efforts "to solve the Syrian crisis through peaceful ways, with the same resolve as before."

Turkey and Syria share a porous, 566-mile (911-kilometer) border, which has allowed rebel leaders to take shelter in Turkey and brought the countries to near war in recent months. Syria was blamed for shooting down a Turkish plane and for lobbing mortars that killed two women and three children.

Syria, which is party to the 1925 Geneva Protocol banning chemical weapons in war, has repeatedly insisted it would not use them even if it did possess such weapons.

Associated Press writer Christopher Torchia in Istanbul contributed to this report.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

Turks protest NATO radar in Malatya

Mon Oct 3, 2011

Thousands of people have demonstrated in Turkey to protest against the planned deployment of a NATO missile system in the eastern province of Malatya.

About 5,000 residents of the city of Kurecik, which is located 700 kilometers from Iran's border and where the missiles will be stationed, took to the streets to condemn the plan on Monday, Turkish NTV news channel reported.

Ankara announced in September that it had agreed on the deployment of the X-Band radar on its territory.

Protesters said on Monday that the system threatens the region's security and economy.

They also criticized the Turkish government, saying that the decision had been made under pressure from the United States.

Meanwhile, opposition parties have called on the government to reject the planned deployment which is aimed at protecting Israel.

The Republican People's Party, headed by Kemal Kilicdaroglu, said that the plan is aimed at protecting Israel from the threat of Iranian missiles.

The leader of the People's Voice Party, Numan Kurtulmus, was also among the critics of the plan, saying that the government opposes Israel on the one hand while agreeing to a plan that is chiefly intended to defend Israel on the other.

Source: PressTV.
Link: http://www.presstv.com/detail/202515.html.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

NATO approves C2 system tests

Sept. 28, 2011

MASSY, France, Sept. 28 (UPI) -- NATO has given approval to Air Command Systems International in France to test a fully integrated C2 system.

The NATO ACCS is the first fully integrated command-and-control system for planning, tasking and execution of air operations and will replace multiple, aging air C2 systems in NATO countries.

"NATO ACCS is the largest system of its kind to be delivered across multiple nations and provides critical new capabilities, including resource management, surface-to-air missile planning and automated flight safety aids in support of modern NATO operations," said Jack Harrington, chief executive officer of ThalesRaytheonSystems, ACSI's parent company.

"ACCS has left the factory to complete its validation at the NATO Test and Validation Facility and the national operational sites."

ACCS was identified as one of the Top 10 NATO priorities at the Lisbon Summit in 2010. With ACCS, NATO operators will have a state-of-the-art air C2 system. ACCS will provide opportunities for common training, standard operational procedures and centralized maintenance for all NATO nations.

Source: United Press International (UPI).
Link: http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2011/09/28/NATO-approves-C2-system-tests/UPI-55921317210149/.

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Turkish parties oppose NATO radar

Mon Sep 26, 2011

Opposition parties in Turkey have expressed their disagreement with the Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan government's decision to host a NATO radar system on the country's soil.

The leader of Turkey's Democratic Party (DP), Namik Kemal Zeybek, voiced his opposition to the Turkish government's decision and warned about its negative consequences.

In an interview with Turkey's TV 8 on Friday, Zeybek said NATO's decision to deploy its missile-tracking radar system on Turkish soil is aimed at monitoring Iran's moves and pitting the two neighboring countries against each other.

He added that the West is seeking to cause rifts in the world of Islam as Iran has resisted its dominance in spite of heavy pressure.

This comes as other opposition parties in Turkey have similarly disagreed with the plan, expressing concerns about its negative impact on the country's relations with its neighbors.

The Republican People's Party (CHP), headed by Kemal Kilicdaroglu, criticized the plan and stated that it is aimed at protecting Israel in the face of Iran's missiles.

The leader of People's Voice Party, Numan Kurtulmus, was also among the critics of the plan, saying that Erdogan's government opposes Israel on the one hand while agreeing to a plan that is chiefly intended to defend Israel on the other.

Another Turkish politician, Mustafa Kamalak, who is the leader of Felicity Party, has additionally pointed out that Turkey's agreement with the deployment of a NATO missile defense system on its soil will distance it from its neighbors.

Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesman Selcuk Unal recently announced Ankara's plan to host the Western military alliance's radar system.

The Turkish official said the plan, which would “boost NATO's defense capacity and strengthen [Turkey's] national defense system,” is in line with the alliance's “New Strategic Concept” adopted in a summit in Lisbon last year.

Source: PressTV.
Link: http://www.presstv.com/detail/201263.html.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Turkey blocks Israel's NATO request

Mon Sep 19, 2011

Amid worsening relations between Tel Aviv and Ankara, Turkey has blocked a bid by Israeli officials to open an office at NATO headquarters.

“Israel recently made an attempt to open an office at NATO in Brussels. We said we would veto this attempt and the issue was not even put on the agenda,” Turkey's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said on Sunday.

A Turkish Foreign Ministry official told the Hurriyet newspaper that Israel attempted to have its request approved earlier this month, after Ankara downgraded ties with Tel Aviv over its refusal to apologize for a raid on an aid ship bound to the Gaza Strip in 2010.

The official added that the issue could not even make its way onto NATO's agenda after Turkey threatened to use its veto.

The 2010 attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, which was sailing in international waters on a mission to break Tel Aviv's siege of the Gaza Strip, left nine Turkish activists dead and dozens of others wounded.

Israel has refused to apologize for the bloodshed, prompting Ankara to expel the Israeli ambassador and cut all bilateral military ties with Israel.

Meanwhile, Turkey has vowed to take action at the International Court of Justice in the Hague to challenge Tel Aviv's four-year siege of Gaza.

The blockade prevents the flow of food, medicine, and other basic supplies into the impoverished coastal territory.

Source: PressTV.
Link: http://www.presstv.com/detail/199940.html.

Thursday, August 2, 2012

NATO officials: Libya war can't go on

Fri Sep 16, 2011

Some of NATO's senior military officials have expressed serious concern over the US-led military alliance's prolonged mission in Libya, urging its quick termination.

"We must end this Libyan business quickly," said one of the alliance's military commanders on condition of anonymity on Wednesday, the Associated Press reported.

Since March, the United States and NATO have unleashed a punishing United Nations-mandated offensive against the fugitive Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi in an alleged attempt to pressure him into giving up power.

The NATO official reminded that the operations were coupled with the alliance's protracted and costly military campaigns in Afghanistan and Kosovo -- which have been kept up for around 10 and 12 years respectively.

"We just cannot afford this proliferation of missions which just drag on and on. One needs to finally end."

Several other senior military officers, who likewise demanded not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter, have similarly voiced concerns that NATO could not manage to press ahead with another long-term engagement, while its member states faced deep defense budget cuts at home.

NATO's Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has stressed that any follow-up mission in Libya, namely ones aimed at nation-building and police-training, had to rather be led by the UN.

Thousands of airstrikes by the alliance have killed many Libyan civilians and revolutionary fighters, who are fighting the government troops.

Source: PressTV.
Link: http://www.presstv.com/detail/199390.html.

Saturday, July 21, 2012

NATO radar to be deployed in southeast: ministry

Ankara (AFP)
Sept 9, 2011

An early warning radar Turkey is planning to host as part of NATO's missile defense system will be deployed in a military facility base near Malatya in the southeast, the foreign ministry said Wednesday.

"The radar will be installed in a military base in Kurecik," in Malatya province, said the ministry in a statement.

Kurecik was hosting a US radar base in the past. The ministry statement also recalled that Turkey benefited from the base in the past for similar purposes.

The radar base is expected to be operational by the end of this year, according to the private NTV television.

Leaders of the 28-member NATO alliance gave their backing last year for the Europe-wide ballistic missile shield -- which US officials say is aimed at thwarting missile threats from the Middle East, particularly Iran.

Tehran criticized Ankara's decision, saying it would create tension and lead to "complicated consequences."

Turkey, a member of NATO since 1952, said the missile system targeted no specific country, adding that it only aimed at defending the NATO sphere.

Source: Space War.
Link: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/NATO_radar_to_be_deployed_in_southeast_ministry_999.html.

Friday, June 22, 2012

Turkey rebuffs Iran over NATO missile shield

2011-09-09

ANKARA - Turkey said Friday NATO's missile system targeted no specific country after Iran heightened criticism of Ankara's plan to host an early-warning radar.

"This system is not against any country. It aims at the defense of NATO sphere," Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesman Selcuk Unal told a weekly news conference in Ankara.

On Thursday, Iran toughened its criticism of the Turkish plan to host the early warning radar system allocated by the United States to NATO, saying it would create tension and lead to "complicated consequences."

Leaders of the 28-member NATO alliance gave their backing last year for the Europe-wide ballistic missile shield -- which US officials say is aimed at thwarting missile threats from the Middle East, particularly Iran.

Source: Middle East Online.
Link: http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=47996.

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Iran: Muslim nations shouldn't serve NATO

Sept. 6, 2011

TEHRAN, Sept. 6 (UPI) -- Muslim countries such as Turkey shouldn't serve the interests of the U.S.-European NATO military alliance, a prominent Iranian lawmaker says.

Iranian Member of Parliament Alaeddin Boroujerdi, chairman of the Majlis National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, said Sunday Turkey's announcement it was close to accepting a NATO missile defense shield radar installation was troubling.

"Muslim countries should maintain security in the region through reliance on their capabilities and cooperation and should not allow a situation to develop where insecurity prevails in the region and NATO's interests in the region are served by Muslim countries," Boroujerdi told the state-owned Mehr News Agency.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry revealed Friday negotiations with NATO over an anti-missile shield had reached "their final stages."

"It is anticipated that the early-warning radar system allocated by the United States to NATO will be deployed in our country," Foreign Ministry spokesman Selcuk Unal said in a written statement.

The early-warning radar is part of an anti-ballistic defense system NATO says is aimed at countering security threats posed by rogue states such as Iran and North Korea.

But Iran claims the system merely serves the interests of Israel and thus Muslim countries, such as Turkey, should not agree to be part of it.

"NATO not only does not contribute to regional security but is also a major source of insecurity in the region," Boroujerdi added. "NATO's intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq illustrated the fact that NATO is only pursuing its own interests in the region."

The lawmaker added, "NATO's intervention in Libya also proved that NATO has no respect for Muslim countries."

Late last year when reports of NATO missile defense systems in Turkey first surfaced, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast blasted it, saying they are solely aimed at defending Israeli interests.

"There are dubious intentions behind the story which raised concerns in regional and Islamic countries," he was quoted as saying by the ISNA news agency. "We are not a threat to regional countries, and the countries in our region, except the Zionist regime, are not a threat to us."

"The measure aims at supporting the Zionist regime and protecting it against its crimes," he added.

The Turkey radar installation is part of NATO's "Strategic Concept," laid out in Lisbon last year, and leans on Turkey for a continuing important role as Iran builds up its strategic missile program.

Last week's announcement by Ankara came after months of negotiations in which Turkey said it would block the anti-missile program if Tehran were specifically named as a threat.

"Mentioning one country, Iran ... is wrong and will not happen," Turkish President Abdullah Gul told the BBC last November. "A particular country will not be targeted. ... We will definitely not accept that."

The Hurriyet Daily News reported Saturday another of Turkey's concerns had to be overcome for the agreement to go forward: Ankara demanded that data collected from the station not be shared with Israel.

The condition came in the wake of Turkey's move last week to suspend military agreements with Israel and downgrade diplomatic relations.

An unnamed Turkish diplomatic source told the newspaper a radar site had already been identified at an unidentified Turkish military installation. Speculation is mounting it will be located either in the eastern province of Malatya or in the southern province of Adana, the newspaper said.

Source: United Press International (UPI).
Link: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Special/2011/09/06/Iran-Muslim-nations-shouldnt-serve-NATO/UPI-42081315305420/.

Monday, June 4, 2012

Iran criticizes NATO's Turkey radar plan

Tehran (AFP)
Sept 5, 2011

A senior Iranian diplomat criticized neighboring Turkey on Monday for agreeing to host an early warning radar as part of NATO's missile defense system for Europe.

"We believe that any kind of presence around our borders by countries from outside the region will not improve security in the region but will actually do the opposite," the official IRNA news agency quoted deputy foreign minister for consular affairs Hassan Ghashghavi as saying.

"Iran and Turkey are two friendly neighboring nations... and have the ability to fully preserve their own security without any foreign intervention," he added.

The Turkish foreign ministry announced on Friday that technical negotiations on the deployment of the radar had "reached a final stage," in a move swiftly welcomed by Washington.

"The hope is to have it deployed by the end of this year," Pentagon spokesman Colonel Dave Lapan told reporters.

Leaders of the 28-member NATO alliance gave their backing last year for the Europe-wide ballistic missile shield, which US officials say is aimed at thwarting missile threats from Iran.

Iranian criticism of Turkey is rare. Tehran has made good relations with Ankara a priority as it has boosted trade ties in the face of EU and US embargoes and looked to its NATO neighbor to mediate in its standoff with the West over its controversial nuclear program.

Source: Space War.
Link: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Iran_criticises_NATOs_Turkey_radar_plan_999.html.

Monday, May 28, 2012

Turkey to host radar for NATO missile defense

Ankara (AFP)
Sept 2, 2011

Turkey plans to deploy an early warning radar by the end of the year as part of NATO's missile defense system for Europe, officials said Friday.

Leaders of the 28-member NATO alliance endorsed plans in Lisbon last year to launch a Europe-wide ballistic missile shield, which US officials say is aimed at thwarting missile threats from Iran.

Technical negotiations about the deployment of the defense system in Turkey "have reached a final stage," Selcuk Unal, spokesman for the Turkish foreign ministry, said in a written statement.

"It is foreseen that the early warning radar system dedicated by the United States to NATO will be deployed in our country," Unal said.

"Turkey's hosting of this element will contribute to the ... defense system, which is developed under NATO's new strategic concept (and) strengthen NATO's defense capacity and Turkey's national defense system," he added.

In Washington, the Pentagon on Friday welcomed Turkey's decision as a step forward for the missile defense project, which initially will rely on naval ships equipped with interceptors designed to knock out incoming missiles.

"The hope is to have it deployed by the end of this year," spokesman Colonel Dave Lapan told reporters.

"This component will link in to the ballistic missile defense capable AEGIS ships that we operate in the Mediterranean," Lapan said.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Turkey's decision marked "a critical contribution to the Alliance's overall defense against current and emerging ballistic missile threats."

He further applauded Ankara for its contribution to "NATO's capability to provide protection to its European territory populations and forces against the growing threat posed by the proliferation of ballistic missiles."

Turkey, concerned over its delicate position with neighboring Iran, persuaded NATO allies to leave out any mention of Iran when the missile defense plan was approved at an alliance summit in November.

Reacting to Turkey's announcement, Russia's foreign ministry restated Moscow's demand for guarantees that "the anti-missile systems deployed in Europe are not aimed at the strategic nuclear forces of Russia".

Source: Space War.
Link: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Turkey_to_host_radar_for_NATO_missile_defense_999.html.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

EU, NATO dismiss Abkhazia election

SUKHUMI, Georgia, Aug. 30 (UPI) -- The European Union and NATO say they don't recognize the results of this past weekend's election of Aleksandr Ankvab as the president of Abkhazia.

Ankvab, one of three candidates who were vying to replace the late President Sergei Bagapsh in the breakaway Georgian region, won with nearly 55 percent of the vote, Abkhazia's Central Elections Commission announced Saturday.

Ankvab was Bagapsh's vice president and was serving as acting president of the enclave, which is officially recognized as a nation only by Russia and a handful of other countries.

Ankvab bested Prime Minister Sergei Shamba and opposition leader Raul Khadzhimba, a former vice president, in the polling, which was Friday.

Shamba received 21 percent of the vote and Khadzhimba garnered 19.8 percent as 106,845 residents -- a 72 percent turnout -- participated, officials said.

Abkhazia, a small state with a population estimated at less than 200,000 and an area smaller than Connecticut, was recognized by Moscow as independent of Georgia after a brief 2008 war between Moscow and Tbilisi over it and another breakaway region, South Ossetia.

Georgia has refused to recognize the results of the Abkhazian election. The country's foreign ministry issued a statement blasting the "so-called presidential elections" in Abkhazia, denouncing "the Russian occupation forces and its proxy regime in Sukhumi" and calling the polling a "mockery of the international law."

Tbilisi accused Moscow of bringing in "several dozen of so-called 'international observers' in an attempt to legitimize the outcome of these 'elections,' and thus the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of thousands of people."

EU High Representative Catherine Ashton and NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen each issued statements over the weekend in which they dismissed the Abkhazian presidential results and referred to it as a "Georgian region."

"In view of the reports today from Sukhumi in the breakaway region of Abkhazia in Georgia, that Mr. Alexander Ankvab has been elected as new president, this statement is to recall that the European Union does not recognize the constitutional and legal framework within which these elections have taken place," the statement from Ashton read.

"The European Union reiterates its support to the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Georgia, as recognized by international law."

Rasmussen, meanwhile, reiterated NATO's "full support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia within its internationally recognized borders" while adding it "does not recognize the elections held on August 26 in the Georgian region of Abkhazia."

Since the cease-fire agreement that ended the 2008 conflict, Russia and Georgia have traded accusations over ethnic cleansing in the breakaway regions and both have denounced the continuing problems of thousands of internally displaced people.

The international community has been meeting regularly on the Abkhazia and South Ossetia security and human rights situations through the Geneva Discussions, by which they are hoping to establish "non-use of force" and associated security agreements.

That is something Georgia supports but Russia opposes.

The EU and the United States have called on Moscow to withdraw its troops to positions held prior to the start of the 2008 hostilities and to allow humanitarian access to Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

"The Russian Federation's deployment of troops and weapons in the regions is inconsistent with its cease-fire commitments and clearly threatens stability," the U.S. State Department said earlier this year.

Source: United Press International (UPI).
Link: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Special/2011/08/30/EU-NATO-dismiss-Abkhazia-election/UPI-20901314698760/.

Monday, January 9, 2012

Nordic Holdouts: Sweden and Finland Mull Joining NATO

By Aron Lamm
August 11, 2011

The simmering NATO membership debate in the supposedly neutral Nordic strongholds of Finland and Sweden have come to the fore lately.

In Sweden, a NATO assessment of the Swedish military led to questions about whether the Swedish conservative government is trying to sneak the country into NATO. In neighboring Finland, the minister for defense recently stated that Finland should consider joining NATO for financial reasons.

Officially speaking, neither country has plans to join NATO, but both are members of the Partnership for Peace program. They also both participate in NATO operations in Kosovo and Afghanistan, and Sweden is also participating in the Libya effort. Every now and then, voices in both countries are raised for full membership.

While this would mean the possibility to actually influence the operations in which they participate, as well as guaranteed protection in the case of war, it would also mean that they would lose their status as neutral peace brokers on the international stage.

Some say that this status is in fact already in jeopardy due to the countries’ current close collaboration with NATO. Sweden’s Defense Ministry recently announced that the armed forces have been reviewed by the NATO Planning and Review Process.

In an article in Swedish newspaper DN recently, former Swedish minister for defense, Thage G. Peterson, and a former Swedish United Nations Ambassador Anders Ferm, accused the government of trying to sneak Sweden into NATO.

"Sweden is in a gray area where we can neither reap the full benefits of a NATO membership, nor claim to be unaligned. The rest of the world sees Sweden as a NATO appendage—but only one Swede in five thinks we should join," the article says.

In a direct reply, former commander-in-chief of the Swedish armed forces says that the reality is Sweden has been a silent member of NATO since the end of World War II.

Meanwhile, Finnish Defense Minister Stefan Wallin, told newspaper Salon Seudun Sanomat this week that the recent cutbacks on military spending raises the question if Finland would be able to defend itself effectively if needed, or if NATO membership would be prudent.

His fellow cabinet member, Foreign Minister Erkki Tuomioja, quickly dismissed this idea, however. He told TV station YLE on Wednesday that NATO membership was "not on the table under the current administration."

The official stance in Sweden is similar, with only one party in the Swedish Parliament and less than one Swede in five supporting a NATO membership, according to a 2010 survey by SOM, an organization affiliated with the University of Gothenburg.

Yet, the door to NATO seems wide open for the day the Swedes change their minds.

NATO’s Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said in response to a question during his visit at the Swedish Institute of International Affairs in March that Sweden already fulfills all criteria for a full NATO membership.

Rasmussen said, "Our door remains open for all democracies in Europe that fulfill the necessary criteria," a category that would most likely include Finland as well, but he added that he did not wish to interfere with a nation’s domestic policy.

Source: The Epoch Times.
Link: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/world/nordic-holdouts-sweden-and-finland-mull-joining-nato-60297.html.

Friday, October 14, 2011

Libyan rebel leaders to hold talks with NATO Council

Brussels (AFP) July 6, 2011

Libyan rebel leaders for the first time will hold talks with NATO's 28-nation North Atlantic Council on July 13 to present their plans for democratic transition, the organization's chief said Wednesday.

Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said the rebel forces were making progress in their battle against Moamer Kadhafi's troops while the Libyan leader's "plans to retake country by force have fallen apart."

NATO's air war, meanwhile, has damaged or destroyed more than 2,700 military targets since March 31, including 600 tanks and artillery pieces and 800 ammunition stores, he said.

On the diplomatic front, a delegation led by Mahmud Jibril of the Benghazi-based National Transitional Council (NTC) will hold informal talks with the NATO's decision-making council in Brussels on July 13.

"The goal of this meeting is to exchange points of view," Rasmussen said. "The NTC has drafted a roadmap and it is important for the NATO Council to discuss this subject with Mr Jibril."

Ramussen will also hold a bilateral meeting with Jibril the same day.

The rebel delegation is also expected to meet in Brussels next week with European Union president Herman Van Rompuy and European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso.

While the 27-nation EU has opened a mission in Benghazi, NATO does not have an office there.

Rasmussen has met NTC officials at meetings abroad of the international contact group on Libya.

Several NATO nations, including the United States, Britain and France, have recognized the NTC as the legitimate representative of the Libyan people. Turkey became the latest alliance member to recognize them on Monday.

NATO is in the fourth month of an air war conducted under a UN mandate to protect civilians from Kadhafi troops.

Rasmussen refused to assess an offensive launched by the rebels on Wednesday in a bid to retake Tripoli.

But, he added, "it is clear that Kadhafi is losing ground every day."

"His war machine is degraded, his generals and ministers are abandoning him and he has lost the support of the international community.

"In short, it's game over."

Source: Space War.
Link: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Libyan_rebel_leaders_to_hold_talks_with_NATO_Council_999.html.

Friday, October 7, 2011

Serb nationalists burn NATO flag

June 13, 2011 — BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) — Serb nationalists — furious over the holding of a NATO conference in Serbia — on Monday burned a NATO flag and put up a huge banner at a Belgrade bridge denouncing the Western military alliance.

About 200 ultranationalists gathered outside pro-Western President Boris Tadic's office, chanting anti-NATO slogans and singing Serb nationalist songs. They accused Tadic of treason. Tadic has "allowed occupation of Serbia, throwing the country at Brussels' and Washington's feet," said Zoran Krasic, senior official from staunchly anti-Western Serbian Radical Party.

The Radicals tried to enter the presidency to hand Tadic a letter but were prevented by the police. Dozens of nationalists also scuffled with riot police at similar protests on Sunday. Nationalists are angry over NATO's bombing in 1999 of Serbia, which ended the country's rule in Kosovo. They argue that Serbia should move closer to Russia rather than NATO.

But Tadic's pro-Western authorities have stepped up cooperation with NATO, joining the Partnership for Peace program for ex-communist nations. The holding of the NATO annual conference in Belgrade is seen as a sign of improving ties.

Also Monday, activists from other nationalist groups spread the banner reading "Never in NATO" along one of the bridges across the Sava river in the Serbian capital. "NATO is evil," declared Stojanka Bodo, a nationalist supporter attending the Belgrade protest. "NATO wants us to become their marionettes and to listen to everything they say."

"They kill and cripple people, they spread death," Bodo said.

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Russia Warns U.S., NATO Against Military Aid to Syria Protests After Libya

By Henry Meyer, Brad Cook and Ilya Arkhipov
Jun 2, 2011

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned the U.S. and European nations not to encourage anti-government protesters in Syria by holding out the prospect of military support like they provided in Libya.

“It is not in the interests of anyone to send messages to the opposition in Syria or elsewhere that if you reject all reasonable offers we will come and help you as we did in Libya,” Lavrov, 61, said yesterday during an interview in Moscow. “It’s a very dangerous position.”

Rallies against President Bashar al-Assad’s rule have swept Syria, inspired by the uprisings that ousted authoritarian rulers in Egypt and Tunisia. Syrian security forces have killed more than 1,100 people and detained at least 10,000, according to human-rights groups. The government blames the protests on Islamic militants and foreign provocateurs.

Russia abstained from the March 18 vote by the United Nations Security Council that authorized the use of force to protect civilians from Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi’s forces, saying the resolution might lead to a “large-scale military intervention.” Operations led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have stretched far beyond the stated goal of enforcing a no-fly zone, Lavrov said.

President Dmitry Medvedev discussed the situation in the Middle East among other issues today in Rome at a trilateral meeting with U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, said Natalia Timakova, the Russian president’s spokeswoman.

UN Involvement Opposed

The U.K., France, Germany and Portugal asked the Security Council on May 25 to demand that Syria end attacks on peaceful protesters and address their grievances. The European Union last week imposed a travel ban and asset freeze on the “highest level of leadership,” a week after the U.S. froze the assets of Assad and six top officials.

Russia opposes Security Council involvement in Syria, Lavrov said.

“First of all, the situation doesn’t present a threat to international peace and security,” he said. “Second, Syria is a very important country in the Middle East and destabilizing Syria would have repercussions far beyond its borders.”

While Russia is opposed to international intervention, it supports the need for change in Syria and has encouraged Assad to implement promised reforms, Lavrov said.

Assad on April 21 ordered the lifting of a 48-year-old state of emergency, abolished the Supreme State Security Court and issued a decree allowing peaceful protests. This week he offered a “general amnesty” covering political detainees.

“We are gratified that our appeals have been heard,” Lavrov said. “Recently he published a draft of a new constitution, he declared an amnesty for political prisoners, and I think this should calm the situation.”

Syria Protests

Protests continued after the amnesty decree, issued late on May 31, as opposition leaders said it was a ploy to gain time.

Lavrov called for the Libyan resolution to be a unique one and said Russia will demand that any future UN mandates be more specific.

“If somebody would like to get authorization to use force to achieve a shared goal by all of us, they would have to specify in the resolution who this somebody is, who is going to use this authorization, what the rules of engagement are and the limits on the use of force,” Lavrov said.

Russia has stepped up diplomatic efforts to help forge a Libyan settlement that would persuade Qaddafi to step down and end NATO military action, Lavrov said.

‘Acceptable to All’

At the Group of Eight summit last week in France, U.S. President Barack Obama and French President Nicolas Sarkozy asked Medvedev to help negotiate a deal acceptable to coalition forces, the African Union and Libyan rebels, Lavrov said.

Medvedev spoke by phone with South African President Jacob Zuma before and after Zuma flew to Tripoli, Libya’s capital, on May 30, Lavrov said. The Russian president also told his special envoy for Libya, Mikhail Margelov, to go to the port city of Benghazi for talks with opposition leaders as soon as possible.

Any solution must “be acceptable to all Libyans,” Lavrov said, echoing comments Zuma made after returning from Tripoli in a trip backed by the African Union.

“I hope that the accumulated effort of all those who want to see an end to the hostilities and the beginning of the construction of a new Libya will bring results,” he said.

The U.S. and its partners, including France and the U.K., launched the first attacks against Qaddafi’s forces on March 19. NATO took command on March 31 and yesterday extended its mission for 90 days in what Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said was “a clear message” that “we are determined to continue our operation to protect the people of Libya.”

Bedouin or Trial

The air raids killed 718 civilians and wounded 4,067 from March 19 to May 26, Agence France Presse reported, citing a spokesman for Libya’s government.

Russia isn’t involved in negotiating “any deals of immunity or guarantees” for Qaddafi, though others are considering a range of options, he said.

“I can tell you without revealing too many secrets that the leaders of countries who can influence the situation are actively discussing the possibilities,” Lavrov said.

Officials at the G-8 summit discussed options for Qaddafi ranging “from a quiet life as a simple Bedouin in the Libyan desert to the fate of Milosevic in the Hague,” Margelov said in an interview yesterday, referring to the war crimes trial of former Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic.

Source: Bloomberg.
Link: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-01/russia-warns-u-s-nato-against-military-aid-to-syria-protests-after-libya.html.

Friday, April 15, 2011

NATO foreign ministers meet amid looming stalemate in Libya

By Xinhua Writer Zhang Wei

BERLIN, April 13 (Xinhua) -- The Libyan crisis is set to dominate the agenda of NATO foreign ministers' gathering in Berlin on Thursday and Friday, amid rising fears that the alliance-led military campaign may face long stalemate.

Foreign ministers from 28 NATO countries, along with non-NATO contributors to the operation of "Unified Protector", will try to find ways to end the Libyan conflicts Thursday, some two weeks after the alliance assumed full control of the campaign from the United States following days of hard bargaining.

However, new rifts have emerged within the alliance as French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe and his British counterpart William Hague on Tuesday publicly pressed their NATO allies to step up air raids in Libya and provide more ground attack aircraft.

In addition, the leaders of France and Britain will hold an unscheduled summit in Paris to discuss the Libyan crisis Wednesday, just on the eve of NATO's meeting, which is seen as a sign of discord.

French officials have also called for the U.S., Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Sweden to enhance their efforts in the campaign.

The U.S. has withdrawn its aircraft from conducting airstrikes against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's ground forces, leaving NATO short of ground attack aircraft. Several European countries also put restrictions on the use of their planes.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen Wednesday defended the alliance's performance in Libya while attending the Contact Group Meeting on Libya in the Qatari capital of Doha.

"I don't agree with (the description of) NATO being slow, we have kept a very high operational tempo...Our operations will end when there is no longer a threat to civilians on the ground." Rasmussen said.

The NATO chief have denied suggestions by some allies, including arming rebel fighters and deploying ground troops in Libya, saying the alliance had not considered "more robust measures."

Analysts said that despite the NATO-led aerial campaign, which do help the rebel fighters on the ground, Gaddafi has shown no signs of stepping down, leaving the endgame of the operation elusive.

During the Berlin talks, NATO foreign ministers will also discuss the ISAF mission in Afghanistan and NATO-Russia ties.

Under mounting domestic pressure, NATO countries are eager to pull their troops out of Afghanistan and want to complete the transition process in Afghanistan by the end of 2014.

Though the Afghan government has announced the first batch of provinces and cities, which are set to be taken over by Afghan forces, the transition process will not be proved easy as many hurdles exist, including lack of capacity of Afghan soldiers and police, resilient Taliban militants.

On Friday, NATO foreign ministers and their Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov will focus on the cooperation on Afghanistan and the European missile defense.

Source: Xinhua.
Link: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-04/14/c_13827658.htm.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Turkey Opposes NATO Military Intervention In Libya

3/14/2011

(RTTNews) - Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Monday that his country was opposed to any sort of NATO military intervention in Libya, warning that such a move could lead to dangerous consequences.

"We see that outside intervention, particularly military intervention, doesn't solve the problem. To the contrary, it deepens it," Erdogan was quoted as saying while addressing a two-day Leaders of Change Summit in Istanbul.

"A NATO intervention to Libya or any other country will be ineffective. Beyond ineffective, it might be dangerous," the Turkish Prime Minister added.

Turkey, a member of the NATO alliance, had earlier objected to any kind of military intervention in Libya, stressing that the 28-member military alliance can intervene militarily only when a member nation is attacked.

The developments come as Britain and France are pressing the international community, especially the UN Security Council, the European Union and the NATO, to enforce a no-fly-zone over Libya to prevent the deaths of civilians in government air raids.

A UN resolution drafted by the two nations is expected to be debated upon by the UN Security Council later in the day. The issue is being debated upon during the G8 foreign ministers meeting progressing in Paris.

The French-British resolution was debated by NATO defense ministers last Thursday. But the NATO ministers also failed to take a final decision on the issue after Germany and the United States rejected the proposal on grounds that the western alliance does not have UN authorization or the regional support required for such direct military action.

However, the proposal has since gained some regional support since then, with the Arab League, a grouping of Arab states considered to a major player in the Middle-East region, backing the enforcement of the no-fly-zone over the weekend.

The developments came amidst an ongoing revolt against the more than four-decade-long autocratic rule of Col. Qadhafi in Libya. He has been ruling oil-rich north African country since a coup in 1969, making him Africa's longest serving leader.

Opposition fighters are believed to be in control of most of the country's eastern region, including the cities of Benghazi and Ajdabiya. Nevertheless, Qadhafi loyalists are still holding on to their stronghold of capital Tripoli and several nearby towns, and are making steady advances towards the east while consolidating their hold on western Libya.

The rebels, who are reportedly struggling to counter the superior fire-power of pro-Qadhafi forces, have been repeatedly requesting the international community to enforce a no-fly-zone over Libya to prevent the Qadhafi regime from using military aircraft against them. They, however, oppose the presence of foreign troops on Libyan soil.

Source: RTT News.
Link: http://www.rttnews.com/Content/GeneralNews.aspx?Id=1575304&SM=1.

Friday, April 8, 2011

NATO to lead Libya war: Turkey

Thu Mar 24, 2011

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu says NATO will take command of the military operation against Libya, after days of debate with the US, Britain and France.

"Our demands have been met on Libya, the operation will be handed over to NATO," the Associated Press quoted Davutoglu as saying on Thursday after meeting his US, French and British counterparts in Ankara.

"The coalition formed after a meeting in Paris is going to give up its mission as soon as possible and hand over the entire operation to NATO with its single command structure," Davutoglu stated.

Prior to the meeting, the marathon talks among NATO countries to end the gridlock over who should take overall command of operations in Libya collapsed on Wednesday when Turkey raised strong reservations about the scope and humanitarian risks of the mission in conflict-torn country.

Turkey brought to the fore the possibility of civilian casualties if the 28-member alliance takes full charge of military operations or take the lead in enforcing a UN-authorized no-fly zone over Libya as the Western coalition continues to bombard pro-Gaddafi forces in several cities.

France emphasized on formation of a committee of coalition countries, including Arab League member states to exercise political control.

Italy had also hinted it would not allow the Western forces to continue using its airfields unless NATO was given the leadership role in the military operations in Libya.

Earlier on Thursday, members of the Turkish parliament agreed on a motion to dispatch naval forces to Libya to help NATO enforce a UN-mandated arms embargo against the North African country.

The US-led military operations in Libya have set off a frenzy of speculations about the real motive behind the move in the oil-rich country, with many analysts saying that under the guise of protecting civilians, as enshrined in the UN Security Council resolution 1973, which permitted the use of force against the Libyan regime, Washington and its Western allies are basically after the North African country's vast oil reserves.

Source: PressTV.
Link: http://www.presstv.ir/detail/171525.html.

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Guard kills two NATO soldiers in Afghanistan

Sat, 19 Mar 2011

Kabul - A security guard in Afghanistan killed two foreign soldiers working with NATO-led troops, the alliance military said Saturday.

"Two international security assistance forces service members died in southern Afghanistan following a shooting incident with a security guard," the coalition forces said in a statement, without giving more details.

The statement did not state whether the security guard was an Afghan or foreign national, and if the incident took place on a NATO base.

NATO officials declined to comment, saying the alliance needs to inform the family members of the deceased before giving out details.

The incident is currently under investigations, the NATO official said.

Troops from the United States, United Kingdom and Canada are stationed in southern Afghanistan. More than 140,000 international troops are currently fighting Taliban insurgents who have been waging a bloody war since 2001.

Around 90 foreign soldiers have been killed so far this year, according to iCausalities, an independent website that tracks military fatalities in Afghanistan.

Separately, a NATO airstrike killed one and injured two others in the eastern province of Nangarhar, the provincial governor's spokesman said.

The operation took place on Friday night in Khogyani, a district in Nangarhar.

"We are investigating to identify if those killed and injured were civilians or insurgents," Ahmad Zia Abdulzai, the spokesman said.

Source: Earth Times.
Link: http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/news/372460,kills-nato-soldiers-afghanistan.html.